Professional Scrum Master I (PSM I)

The Professional Scrum Master I (PSM I) validates a fundamental understanding of the Scrum framework and its application in real-world scenarios. It ensures that the holder understands the roles, events, and artifacts defined in the Scrum Guide to foster team productivity. Achieving the symbol PSM_1 is a significant step for anyone looking to facilitate high-performing agile teams.

---------- Question 1

The Development Team consistently produces high-quality code but is struggling to estimate story points accurately. Their estimates are frequently wildly inaccurate, leading to unpredictable sprint goals and incomplete work. What's the best way to address this, aligning with Scrum principles?

1. Impose a stricter estimation process, requiring detailed task breakdowns and time estimations from each developer.
2. Switch to a different estimation technique, like T-Shirt sizing, assuming it will resolve the issue effortlessly.
3. Facilitate team-based estimation sessions with focused training on effective estimation techniques and collaborative refinement.
4. Introduce a system of penalties for inaccurate estimates to motivate better performance.

---------- Question 2

A stakeholder consistently requests changes to already-approved Product Backlog items during the Sprint. This disrupts the team's focus and leads to missed Sprint Goals. How should the Scrum Master best address this situation?

1. Allow the stakeholder to make changes, as flexibility is crucial in Agile.
2. Ignore the stakeholder's requests to maintain the Sprint's integrity.
3. Explain the impact of changes during the Sprint and facilitate a discussion on managing stakeholder expectations and prioritizing changes for future Sprints.
4. Reprioritize the Product Backlog to include the stakeholder's requested changes, even if it means delaying other items.

---------- Question 3

During Sprint Retrospective, the team expresses frustration about the frequent interruptions from stakeholders requesting urgent changes outside the Sprint backlog. The interruptions consistently disrupt the team's focus and impact sprint goals. What's the most effective action for the Scrum Master to take?

1. Tell the stakeholders that their interruptions are unacceptable and must stop immediately.
2. Help the team establish clear communication protocols and boundaries with stakeholders regarding communication during a Sprint.
3. Suggest the team work longer hours to compensate for the lost time caused by interruptions.
4. Reassign the stakeholders' urgent requests to a separate team to avoid disturbing the Scrum Team’s focus.

---------- Question 4

Your team is experiencing frequent conflicts between developers with differing programming styles. These conflicts are slowing down development and impacting team morale. What is the most effective way to address this situation as a Scrum Master?

1. Establish strict coding standards and enforce them rigidly.
2. Facilitate a team discussion to openly address the conflicts, promoting active listening and finding collaborative solutions.
3. Mediate each conflict individually, dictating the 'right' approach to coding.
4. Assign individual developers to work on isolated components to avoid further conflict.

---------- Question 5

Your team is struggling with consistently delivering 'Done' increments. Sprint Reviews consistently reveal unfinished work, and the Product Owner is frustrated by the lack of demonstrable progress. The Sprint Retrospective reveals a lack of clarity around the definition of 'Done' and inconsistent adherence to the team's process. What is the BEST course of action for the Scrum Master?

1. Reprimand the team for their lack of discipline and enforce stricter adherence to the existing process.
2. Facilitate a workshop with the team and Product Owner to collaboratively refine the Definition of Done, emphasizing shared understanding and commitment.
3. Suggest the team adopt a more rigid process with detailed task breakdowns and stricter time allocations.
4. Escalate the issue to management, suggesting the team needs more training on Scrum fundamentals.

---------- Question 6

The Development Team is consistently struggling to complete their Sprint Goals. They report feeling overwhelmed and pressured. Upon investigation, you discover that the Product Owner is adding new items to the Sprint Backlog throughout the Sprint. What's your best course of action?

1. Tell the Product Owner to stop adding items mid-Sprint.
2. Tell the Development Team to just work harder.
3. Coach the Product Owner on the importance of Sprint commitment and the impact of adding new work mid-Sprint, emphasizing the negative effects on team morale and productivity. Discuss alternative strategies for managing urgent requests.
4. Ignore the situation as it's the Product Owner's responsibility.

---------- Question 7

During Sprint Review, stakeholders express concern about the quality of a delivered feature. They identify a significant usability issue that was not caught during testing. What is the BEST approach for the Scrum Master to respond?

1. Immediately blame the Development Team for overlooking the usability issue.
2. Dismiss the stakeholders' concerns, highlighting the team's successful delivery of other features.
3. Facilitate a discussion to understand the root cause of the usability issue, focusing on improving the process for future Sprints.
4. Schedule an urgent meeting with only the Development Team to fix the bug before the next Sprint.

---------- Question 8

A new team member is struggling to integrate into the Scrum Team. They are hesitant to participate actively in Sprint Planning and daily stand-ups, and their work is often delayed. What is the best course of action for the Scrum Master?

1. Ignore the behavior and hope it improves on its own.
2. Publicly criticize the new team member for their lack of participation.
3. Coach the team member individually, focusing on their concerns, actively listening to their challenges, and offering support in integrating them into the team dynamics.
4. Assign the team member to less critical tasks to reduce pressure.

---------- Question 9

Stakeholders are consistently unhappy with the progress of the project, despite regular Sprint Reviews and demonstrations. They feel excluded from the process and lack a clear understanding of the team's work and challenges. What's the BEST course of action for the Scrum Master to address this?

1. Reduce the frequency of Sprint Reviews to avoid overwhelming stakeholders.
2. Increase the technical details shared during Sprint Reviews to ensure stakeholders understand the complexities involved.
3. Improve communication with stakeholders by establishing a transparent and consistent communication plan including regular updates, visual dashboards and open forums.
4. Ignore stakeholder concerns; they should trust the team to deliver.

---------- Question 10

The development team is consistently delivering working software, but the quality is inconsistent, leading to higher defect rates. As the Scrum Master, what's your best approach?

1. Blame the development team for poor quality and enforce stricter coding standards.
2. Suggest implementing more rigorous testing practices, perhaps with dedicated QA resources.
3. Facilitate a retrospective to identify the root causes of the quality issues and collaborate on solutions.
4. Reduce the sprint length to improve focus and quality.

---

Are they useful?

Click here to get 480 more questions to pass this certification at the first try! Explanation for each answer is included!

Follow the below LINKEDIN channel to stay updated about 89+ exams!

The Agile Hub